<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeopathy as a case study of bad science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://variablefragment.com/news-clipping/homeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://variablefragment.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fvariablefragment.com%2Fnews-clipping%2Fhomeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Homeopathy+as+a+case+study+of+bad+science</link>
	<description>Thoughts on biology, research and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://variablefragment.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fvariablefragment.com%2Fnews-clipping%2Fhomeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science%2F%23comment-84&amp;seed_title=Homeopathy+as+a+case+study+of+bad+science/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variablefragment.com/news-clipping/homeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>you just got a new regular reader... although i did just google &quot;master cell bank&quot; and find an article that you wrote.. but i liked it so i kept reading, very interesting stuff, keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you just got a new regular reader&#8230; although i did just google &#8220;master cell bank&#8221; and find an article that you wrote.. but i liked it so i kept reading, very interesting stuff, keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH</title>
		<link>http://variablefragment.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fvariablefragment.com%2Fnews-clipping%2Fhomeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science%2F%23comment-38&amp;seed_title=Homeopathy+as+a+case+study+of+bad+science/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>RH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variablefragment.com/news-clipping/homeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really have regular readers, it&#039;s mostly people who&#039;ve Googled a particular topic and found an article that I wrote.

As far as a non-science talking science talker who talks science to a non-scientist ... I&#039;d think the answer to that was obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really have regular readers, it&#8217;s mostly people who&#8217;ve Googled a particular topic and found an article that I wrote.</p>
<p>As far as a non-science talking science talker who talks science to a non-scientist &#8230; I&#8217;d think the answer to that was obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://variablefragment.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fvariablefragment.com%2Fnews-clipping%2Fhomeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science%2F%23comment-37&amp;seed_title=Homeopathy+as+a+case+study+of+bad+science/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variablefragment.com/news-clipping/homeopathy-as-a-case-study-of-bad-science/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Considering your readers, I doubt there will be many more comments on this topic. I assume almost everyone would agree with you. So just for the heck of it I will posit this:

What about someone who talks non-science to a scientist but not to a non-scientist? Should we distrust them as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering your readers, I doubt there will be many more comments on this topic. I assume almost everyone would agree with you. So just for the heck of it I will posit this:</p>
<p>What about someone who talks non-science to a scientist but not to a non-scientist? Should we distrust them as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
